| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| jkizzle cutter
 
  
 
 Joined: 29 Oct 2007
 Posts: 519
 Location: I.L.L.
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:09 pm    Post subject: Chain slack on SS MTB |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| How much slack should i have on a single speed mountain bike chain? 
 Taut or a little wiggle room?
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| brokebike cutter
 
  
 
 Joined: 21 Oct 2007
 Posts: 2434
 Location: local
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:19 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| same as a fixed... somewhere in the range of 1/4" deflection (give or take a bit) should be about right. 
 a chain should never really be "taut" IMO.
 slack chains aren't as detrimental as too-tight chains.
 _________________
 ------------[]  O
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| jkizzle cutter
 
  
 
 Joined: 29 Oct 2007
 Posts: 519
 Location: I.L.L.
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:38 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Well i know some track riders have some substantial slack due to the amount of torque they put on the chain, didnt know if there was similarities taking a mountain bike up a hill. I guess the substantially lower gear ratio negates that though. Thanks |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| sailorjames cutter
 
  
 
 Joined: 15 Nov 2007
 Posts: 329
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 8:38 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Slack is better than taught, running it too tight runs the risk of damaging your bottom bracket/hub bearings since only having one speed forces you to put tremendous torque on those pieces vs. just gearing down. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| elzie5000 cutter
 
  
 
 Joined: 25 Oct 2007
 Posts: 1177
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:46 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | jkizzle wrote: |  	  | Well i know some track riders have some substantial slack due to the amount of torque they put on the chain, | 
 
 It has nothing to do with torque. Track riders typically run their chains with more slack to reduce friction as much as possible and because they're riding on a perfectly smooth surface so there's less chance of throwing the chain.
 
 Brokebike's 1/4" suggestion is a good rule of thumb for a mountain bike. I usually have double that on my alleycat bike and have never had a chain problem.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| brokebike cutter
 
  
 
 Joined: 21 Oct 2007
 Posts: 2434
 Location: local
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:34 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | elzie5000 wrote: |  	  | Brokebike's 1/4" suggestion is a good rule of thumb for a mountain bike. I usually have double that on my alleycat bike and have never had a chain problem. | 
 
 yeah, I had originally typed 1/4" - 1/2" as a good range, but then considered that, though unlikely, depending on how low of a gearing you would be running on a SS mtn bike, you might get some chain slap issues.
 _________________
 ------------[]  O
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| politicalhero cutter
 
  
 
 Joined: 22 Oct 2007
 Posts: 657
 Location: Sexy Lexi on the Southside
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:54 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | elzie5000 wrote: |  	  | on my alleycat bike and have never had a chain problem.
 | 
 
 Insert coaster brake joke here!
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| elzie5000 cutter
 
  
 
 Joined: 25 Oct 2007
 Posts: 1177
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:32 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				|  	  | politicalhero wrote: |  	  | Insert coaster brake joke here! | 
 
 Just for that, expect pics of my junk on your camera when you pick it up.
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |